"The dialectics of history is such that the theoretical victory of world socialism will increasingly force our opponents to disguise themselves as 'Stalinist - Hoxhaists' !"

Comintern (SH)

06 - 03 - 2012





Statement of the Comintern (SH)
22 October 2017

Today, the Comintern (SH) has broken off her friendly relations with the group "Matin Rouge" ("Red Morning" - Morocco)



Our tolerance to the mistakes of friendly organizations always ends at that time and wherever our comradely criticism is ignored, where fundamental mistakes are insisted, whereby our Stalinist-Hoxhaist principles are violated, on which our relationship and cooperation are based.

This is not a matter of some unimportant errors, but of principal deviations from the general-line of the Comintern (SH), namely, whether one recognizes or rejects Stalinism-Hoxhaism as a basis for cooperation with the Comintern (SH).


"Matin Rouge" rejects Stalinism-Hoxhaism

(Ideological criticism)

"Matin Rouge" rejects cooperation with the Comintern (SH) on the basis of Stalinism-Hoxhaism. And vice versa: the Comintern (SH) rejects the co-operation with "Matin Rouge" because it does not recognize Stalinism-Hoxhaism.

It is the indisputable right of "Matin Rouge" to make their own decisions without letting themselves be influenced by the Comintern (SH). They are free to decide for or against Stalinism-Hoxhaism.

But it is just as incontestable that the Comintern (SH), for its part, makes its own decisions without being influenced by "Matin Rouge" or other organizations.

We have the right to choose our friends ourselves or to quit the friendship with those we can no longer tolerate as friends because they left our common path to the socialist revolution.

We judge friends according to their attitude towards Stalinism-Hoxhaism.

This group, "Matin Rouge", denies the existence of Stalinism-Hoxhaism as the further development of Marxism-Leninism. With this they put themselves on the side of the neo-revisionists, who have denied Stalinism-Hoxhaism from the outset.The centrism of the Moroccan central organ "Matin Rouge" ("Red Morning") serves the adaptation of Stalinism-Hoxhaism to neo-revisionism.

"Matin Rouge" does not defend Stalinism-Hoxhaism against neo-revisionism, but takes a conciliatory attitude. Stalinism-Hoxhaism and Neo-revisionism are antagonistic, irreconcilable ideologies. The one is the proletarian ideology and the other is a bourgeois ideology.

Is it not totally clear that the Comintern (SH) breaks off the friendship with those organizations which want to reconcile Stalinism Hoxhaism with Neo-Revisionism?

How does the centrism of "Matin Rouge" appear? It appears hiddenly!

This group hides its centrism behind the veil of "anti-centrism".

In words, they are "anti-centrists" - in deeds they asre hidden centrists.

What is the ideological core of the centrism of the "Matin Rouge" group?

The centrism of the "Matin Rouge" group is that they "recognize" the teachings of the 5 Classics of Marxism-Leninism, however without recognizing the special ideology of Stalinism-Hoxhaism.

These centrists are so dangerous because they try to drive a wedge between Marxism-Leninism and Stalinism-Hoxhaism.

Can the 5 Classics of Marxism-Leninism be acknowledged, without the acknowledgement of Stalinism-Hoxhaism as the further development of Marxism-Leninism? Of course, not.

Whoever is against Stalinism-Hoxhaism can not be for Marxism-Leninism, because the immanent principle of the further development of the proletarian ideology cannot be denied. The ideology of the impossibility of the further development of the proletarian ideology is a revisionist ideology of liquidationism.

Therefore, there can never be unity with the centrists. We need unity only with those organizations, who fight with us against neo-revisionists, and not with those who are conciliators of the neo-revisionists. And if friendly organizations are neither willing to practice self-criticism, nor to correct their anti-Stalinist-Hoxhaist positions, they are entirely responsible by themselves. The group "Matin Rouge" let us know that it is indifferent to them whether the Comintern (SH) agrees with the position of "Matin Rouge" or not. They have told us that they intend to continue their neo-revisionist course.

"With or without the Comintern (SH)" [!] - that is their answer.

In other words, the opinion of the Comintern (SH) is completely irrelevant to the group "Matin Rouge".

To "swear" to friendship with the Comintern (SH), but to collaborate with the enemies of the Comintern (SH) - what is it? It is a cheating at the Comintern (SH).

And what does the Comintern (SH) do with cheaters?

Cheaters who abuse the confidence of the Comintern (SH) can not hope for mercy.

We have never spared the centrists and will never spare them. We have always exposed the machinations of the centrists as what they are, as machinations against Stalinism-Hoxhaism.

These have been the ideological contradictions why the Comintern (SH) has decided to break off our friendly relations with "Matin Rouge".

This decision was not taken spontaneously, but is the result of the increasing negative experiences we have made with the wavering ideology of this Moroccan grouping. We were watchful from the very beginning. "Matin Rouge" must know: We are not hagglers on the Moroccan bazaar to barter away our principles!

* * *


What are the political reasons and concrete incidents why we separate from "Matin Rouge"?

(political criticism)

The straw to break the camel's back was their propagation of the anti-Stalinist-Hoxhaist slogan of the so called "National Democratic Revolution" ("Matin Rouge")

With its slogan of the "national democratic revolution", "Matin Rouge" plays the role as the "defender" of the Marxist-Leninist doctrine of Comrade Enver Hoxha. Simultaneously, "Matin Rouge" considers the Comintern (SH) as a "falsifier" of the teachings of Enver Hoxha. In their opinion, we would want to "skip" the "preliminary stages" of the socialist revolution. For "Matin Rouge" this is a clear "proof" for our "sectarianism" and "dogmatism".

Who is right ?
"Matin Rouge" or the Comintern (SH)?

The Comintern (SH), which Enver Hoxha had raised up to the level of the 5th Classic of Marxism-Leninism in the year 2000 and which defended him principled against the falsifications of his doctrine by the Neo-revisionists, does not doubt the correctness of the doctrine of Comrade Enver Hoxha.

"Matin Rouge" seems to have never heard of the fact that the 5 Classics of Marxism-Leninism have always been criticized as "dogmatists" and "sectarians". From whom comes this criticism? This criticism never came from the working class, but only from its opponents. It is always the revisionists who first attacked Marx and Engels, then Lenin and Stalin, and today Enver Hoxha as "dogmatists" and "sectarians". The one or the other of the five Classics of Marxism-Leninism was always accused as a "falsifier" and "deviator" of the teachings of the other Classics. Today, it is the neo-revisionists who insult the Stalinist-Hoxhaists as "sectarians" and "dogmatists", only because we fight for the purity of the proletarian ideology.

For decades, the neo-revisionists wanted nothing to do with comrade Enver Hoxha and tried to make his teachings forget. But what happened when the Comintern (SH) entered the stage of the communist world movement in the year 2000? Who has spread the doctrines of Enver Hoxha everywhere on this planet ? (by the way, also in the Arab countries!) The Neo-revisionists or the Comintern (SH)? And "Matin Rouge"? Have they translated and published works of Enver Hoxha? Not a single Arabic text! In this respect, they are not at all different from the Neo-revisionists! We have repeatedly demanded that the writings of Enver Hoxha are finally translated into the Arabic language. We did not only ask "Matin Rouge" but called for it in the entire Arab world. To this day we are falling on deaf ears. But sorry ! "Matin Rouge" has primarily to prepare the "national democratic revolution", and of course, they can not waste their valuable time with the production of Arabic writings of Enver Hoxha. Annoying translation work, by the way, is only shunned by the genuine dogmatists and sectarians. To pick up a few quotations of this or that page of books and to place them in front of the cart of their "national democratic revolution", this seems to be quite sufficient for "Matin Rouge". "Matin Rouge" is neither able nor willing to understand Hoxhaism as a science, namely to study it conscientiously according to the particular conditions of Morocco, for the purpose of its correct application. In our opinion, "Matin Rouge" studied the Comrade Enver Hoxha superficially. That is why they misunderstood and misapplied his teachings. The liberation of the Arab world is impossible if the doctrines of Comrade Enver Hoxha are not applied in a creative spirit, but only like a literalist (=literally). This is precisely how Hoxhaism must be masterfully studied and applied. Masterful application also involves anchoring Hoxhaism in the consciousness of the working class, and not just in one's own individual head.

The Comintern (SH) has taught all comrades throughout the Arab world that one can not defend Enver Hoxha if one refuses to spread his teachings in the Arab working class. Has "Matin Rouge" fulfilled this important task? No, because they were mainly concerned with students and not with the workers. But why should the Moroccan working class need the teachings of Enver Hoxha? "Matin Rouge" doesn't give a shit. It is sufficient if "Matin Rouge" uses this knowlegde for the privileged "leaders". "Matin Rouge" complains about illiteracy in Morocco. But they themselves are unable and unwilling to teach the Moroccan working class the ABC of Hoxhaism.

Simply to say that Enver Hoxha would have made only some sort of "contributions" to Marxism-Leninism is not the same as to acknowledge Enver Hoxha as the fifth Classic of Marxism-Leninism. Only in words, "Matin Rouge" recognizes Comrade Enver Hoxha as the 5th Classic of Marxism-Leninism, but in deeds they treat him like a "4½". Classic of Marxism-Leninism. And that is why "Matin Rouge" is just as neo-revisionist as their friends from the ICMLPO. We have taken up the fight against the representatives of the ideology of the 4½ Classics and thus have made our modest contribution to the struggle against the Neo revisionists. And of course, this is a thorn in the flesh of the Neo revisionists. So the Neo revisionists have no choice but to defend themselves against us.

How do they do that?

They try to beat us with our own weapons. However the bourgeoisie, by herself, is incapable of doing so. For this reason, the bourgeoisie needs the service of renegades and traitors such as the leaders of the ICMLPO. And the spearhead is "Matin Rouge" in Morocco. And as the spearhead the centrists of "Matin Rouge" are predestined in Morocco. "Matin Rouge" must pull the chestnuts out of the fire for the Neo-revisionists.

And so we have revealed the true intentions of "Matin Rouge". Now everyone knows what the slogan of the "national democratic revolution" means in truth. The Neo revisionists have "re-discovered" the teachings of Enver Hoxha, but only for one single purpose: they need the falsification of Enver Hoxha's teachings as a weapon against the Comintern (SH). With selling their falsifications, the Neo revisionists peddle around the world. In Africa, this task has been taken over by the CP Togo, who wants to meet with "Matin Rouge" for common action against the Comintern (SH) on 18 November. We have the proof: "Matin Rouge" collaborates openly with the Neo revisionists! The so-called "people's front" of the Neo-revisionists is not a front against the bourgeois parties, but with the bourgeois parties. It is in fact a neo-revisionist unified front against the Comintern (SH), which is forged there! In order to achieve this goal, "Matin Rouge" put on the mask of an "opponent of the Neo revisionists" to deceive the Comintern (SH). And in this deceptive way, "Matin Rouge" has wangled the Comintern (SH). In fact, "Matin Rouge" is more dangerous than all the other neo-revisionists because of their masquerade as an "anti-neo-revisionist" organization. But with their revelation about their "national democratic revolution" they have shown themselves openly as followers of the neo-revisionist camp.

The slogan of the "national-democratic revolution" is nothing other than the application of Dimitroff's "people's front-line" politics to the situation in the countries exploited and oppressed by the imperialists, such as Morocco. With this statement, we pulled down the mask of the Neo revisionists. Now the Moroccan working class, as well as the working class in many other countries of Africa and in the Arab world, finally learns the truth. The better the working class succeeds in distinguishing the true friends from false "friends", the better conditions it creates for the victory of the socialist revolution. Revealing the fraud of "Matin Rouge" is a victory against neo-revisionism. If "Matin Rouge" steps ever deeper into the neo-revisionist swamp, then this is entirely their own thing. We will neither follow them, nor pull them out of the swamp. Where will this neo-revisionist swamp end ? It ends exactly there, where the bourgeois independence movement in Africa ended, namely in the arms of world imperialism! The "national democratic revolution" has produced such fascists as Mobutu and consorts who have stifled the peoples of Africa in their blood, just as the blood of the Arab peoples has flowed and continues to flow. And so Maoism in Africa has led to the enslavement of the African peoples by Chinese imperialism. It was exactly comrade Enver Hoxha who was fighting against such mass murderers as Mobutu and Co who wagged with the banner of the national democratic revolution. Is it not high time that the Comintern (SH) separates from such false "friends" like "Matin Rouge"?

* * *

"Matin Rouge" has committed the grave mistake of transposing the historical conditions at the time of Enver Hoxha, dogmatically and unmodified to today's situation, which has undoubtedly changed.

Can a Marxist-Leninist ignore the historical changes of the objective factor of revolution? We believe that this is not Marxist-Leninist, but dogmatic.

"Matin Rouge" made the mistake of equating the situation in Albania and the situation in Morocco uncritically. Can a Marxist-Leninist ignore the peculiarities of the revolution in his own country? We believe that this is not Marxist-Leninist, but dogmatic.

"Matin Rouge" has not noticed that the teachings of Enver Hoxha were valid under the conditions over 70 years ago, while we are living today in the age of globalization. Insisting on the teachings of Enver Hoxha about the national democratic revolution under today's conditions of globalized capitalism is nothing but their misuse. And misuse of his teachings is a betrayal at Enver Hoxha !

What is the significance of these changes of the objective situation for the revolution in Morocco?

Meanwhile, world imperialism has transformed all the countries of the world into capitalist countries. More than that. South Africa became a BRICS country, thus its character became imperialistic (!) Imperialism means highest (and final!!!) stage of capitalism. Capitalism begins to decay in Africa, and "Matin Rouge" wants to prolong its existence by means of the "national-democratic revolution (?!) Comrade Enver Hoxha, 70 years ago, could not foresee such an economical development in Africa. He cannot be blamed for "Matin Rouge" who refuse to open up their eyes to see what happens in their own country !

As a matter of fact, the profit of the capitalists is squeezed out of the surplus labor of the working class. Thus the working class in Africa formed an inexhaustible reservoir of cheap labor. There are no longer only mineral deposits being robbed, but foreign factories have been built all over Africa and the most modern agricultural production facilities have been set up in Africa. After 70 years, Africa has developed into a capitalist continent - equipped with modern infrastructure and the latest technology.

This has resulted in a completely new African working class, a class created by world imperialism, a new gigantic African army of gravediggers of capitalism. However, "Matin Rouge" want to misuse this army of gravediggers of capitalism for the purpose of the "national-democratic revolution" ! Today, all these new economic achievements are available for the construction of socialism, which did not exist in times of Enver Hoxha. It is world imperialism that has created the objective conditions of building up socialism in Africa. Everything that is necessary in objective conditions for the construction of socialism in Africa has already been sufficiently created by globalization. Africa is ripe for the socialist revolution however "Matin Rouge" wants to go back to the "national-democratic revolution" (!)

Morocco is ripe for the socialist revolution, and we are propagating it on our Moroccan website from the very beginning. The group "Matin Rouge", however, does not want to know anything about the direct path to socialism, and wants first settle down on comfortable intermediate stage between capitalism and socialism. And this has nothing to do with Leninism but much to do with revisionism. What is friendship worth if the group "Matin Rouge" simultaneously advocates Comintern(SH)'s direct way to socialism by the socialist revolution and the intermediate stage of the "national democratic revolution"? Both these ways to socialism are mutually exclusive. However, the group "Matin Rouge" would like to go with its petty-bourgeois foot on the road of the "National Democratic Revolution" and go with its proletarian foot on the direct road of the socialist revolution. This acrobatics cannot break "Matin Rouge"'s fall. This balancing act means nothing but the failure of centrism on the field of politics. Either a petty-bourgeois way or a proletarian way - there is no intermediate way.

* * *

The Comintern (SH) teaches:

Morocco is a country in which the capitalist class society dominates.The main contradiction in this country is that between capital and labor. In Morocco the capital determines the life of the country. Capitalism is the dominant driving force of the development of the economical basis. The bourgeoisie is the dominating class. The contradiction between labor and capital can not be solved by the "national democratic revolution," but only by the armed socialist revolution. The socialist revolution is now on the agenda of the Moroccan working class (see our article: "What is the significance of the Moroccan revolution for the socialist world revolution?").

This corresponds to the teachings of the 5 Classics of Marxism-Leninism and the general line of the Comintern (SH).

Their economic justification for the "national democratic revolution" is this: "Morocco is not yet a developed country because the productive forces are not enough developed for the transition to socialism". This sentence is a literal copy of Kautsky. This is pure economism, and Lenin has excellently debunked economism.

The construction of socialism in Morocco could begin immediately, namely as soon as the Moroccan proletariat has established the dictatorship of the proletariat. Anyone who wants to fight for socialism in Morocco must fight for the dictatorship of the proletariat directly, in order to seize and socialize the means of production.

This is only possible with the socialist revolution, but not with the "national democratic revolution", in which the means of production are left untouched in the hands of the ruling classes, while the class society of capitalism will continue to exist. The Moroccan proletariat will therefore choose the direct way to socialism and not the wrong way of the revisionist "intermediate-stage-theory".

* * *

"Matin Rouge" of all, propagates the "national democratic revolution" on the occasion of the 100th anniversary of the October Revolution. This is a mockery! This is a provocation not only against the world proletariat, but also against the Moroccan working class. In words for the October Revolution, in deeds for the bourgeois national-democratic revolution. This is the position of the "People's front" of the neo-revisionists, but not of the Stalinist-Hoxhaist position of the armed proletarian revolution. “Matin Rouge” goes the path of Dimitrov's betrayal of the October revolution ! What we wrote in: "100 years of betrayal at the October Revolution" (chapter on the betrayal of Dimitrov), also applies to "Matin Rouge". "Matin Rouge" has sold the October revolution on the Moroccan bazaar for the ridiculously low price of the “national democratic revolution”. A bad deal for the Moroccan working class. Only the petty bourgeoisie is capable to such a deceptive business. It is the Moroccan petty bourgeoisie, which believes that its existence as a class is preserved by selling the proletariat to the bourgeoisie. But it is a fallacy of the petty bourgeoisie to believe that it can maintain its existence as a class by means of a betrayal at the proletariat. This class has no future, either in Morocco or elsewhere in the world. The petty bourgeoisie is a class condemned to dying.

What is the attitude of "Matin Rouge" to the neo-revisionists of ICMLPO?

As centrists that they are, they want to be good friends of both the ICMLPO and the Comintern (SH). We, however, renounce those "friends" who are the friends of our enemies.

A few years ago, we criticized the fact that they have made propaganda for the Brazilian party of ICMLPO.

And today ? To this day nothing has changed.

Today, "Matin Rouge" collaborates with the CP Togo (affiliated with ICMLPO). The CP Togo has not distanced itself from the ICMLPO until today. No self-criticism has been published. "Matin Rouge" considers the CP Togo to be the "only party in Africa based on the 5 Classics of Marxism-Leninism" [!], although the CP Togo belongs to the neo-revisionist ICMLPO.[!].

ICMLPO = “Marxist-Leninist” - that is the unadorned truth of “Matin Rouge”. On the website of the CP Togo, our 5 heads of the Classics of Marxism-Leninism can be seen. So, "Matin Rouge" holds the CP Togo therefore for "Marxist-Leninist" just because of a picture that, besides, the CP Togo has stolen from the Comintern (SH).

In the conciliatory attitude towards the CP Togo, the centrism of "Matin Rouge" reappears. The five heads of the Classics of Marxism-Leninism are misused to degenerate them into a collection symbol of various ideological trends. "Matin Rouge" has the impertinence to unite various organizations, including the ICMLPO and the Comintern (SH) under the umbrella of the 5 Classics! This counterrevolutionary act is an attack on the proletarian ideology, on the world proletariat and the Comintern (SH). The 5 heads of Marxism-Leninism belong to the Comintern (SH), belong to us Stalinist-Hoxhaists! And to no one else! "Matin Rouge" are counterrevolutionaries, because they have betrayed the Comintern (SH), which in 2000 created the 5 heads of the Classics of Marxism-Leninism itself - last not least, as a symbol of the struggle against neo-revisionism. Neo-revisionism is the main danger in today's world communist world movement! And reconciliation with the neo-revisionists is betrayal against Marx, Engels, Lenin, Stalin and Enver Hoxha ! "Matin Rouge" are traitors of the 5 Classics of Marxism-Leninism, and as such they have to be combated by the Stalinist-Hoxhaists !

The CP Togo is not the only party in the world that has stolen the Comintern (SH) logo. Nothing else can be expected from the enemies of the Comintern (SH). But also from our friends?

"Matin Rouge" has used the party logo of the Comintern (SH) without our permission as a logo for their facebook page, without asking permission from the Comintern (SH). The logo of the World Party can be used only by the Sections of the Comintern (SH) - by no one else. Because of the protest of the Comintern (SH) "Matin Rouge" was forced to delete our logo from their facebook-site.

Another example of the falsification of the five heads of the Classics of Marxism-Leninism:

"Matin Rouge" has placed (in one of their logos) the 5 Classics in the same row with some Moroccan leaders. We have also criticized this as an impermissible depreciation of the doctrines of the 5 classics of Marxism-Leninism. "Matin Rouge" doesn't give a damn !. They use this picture of vilification of the 5 heads in the public - in spite of our criticism . "Matin Rouge" takes the view: "Everyone has the freedom to do what he/she wants with the 5 heads of the Classics of Marxism-Leninism!"

And the origin of the name "Matin Rouge"? They have stolen this name ! It is the plagiarize name of the Central organ ("ROTER MORGEN") of our party , the KPD / ML of Ernst Aust ! Under the name of our Central organ, they sell their opportunism and so pollute the revolutionary spirit of our party. In Germany, we call this: "to adorn oneself with borrowed plumes!"

The thieves of "Matin Rouge" pose before the working class as something they are really not, honest communists!

However, this is not the end of the list of their crimes. "Matin Rouge" does not only misuse our names. They also abuse the publications of the Comintern (SH) to conceal their neo-revisionist course behind them.

This is particularly evident in the way "Matin Rouge" has manipulated our text: "What is the significance of the Moroccan revolution for the socialist world revolution?" "Matin Rouge" does not agree with the text of the Comintern (SH) - ok. Why does "Matin Rouge" not criticize the Comintern (SH)? Why did they not want to discuss on their disagreements with us? They did not do that. What did they do instead? They selected a few paragraphs from the text, which suited politically to them. And they deleted all those paragraphs (nearly the complete text!) which did not suit their opportunist line.

What a shameful attitude towards friends!

Despite frequent questions, we have not received an answer as to why the article of the Comintern (SH) has been translated and published neither in Arabic nor in French. For whom has the Comintern (SH) written the article? For the Moroccan proletariat. But "Matin Rouge" apparently does not want our article to be read by the Moroccan proletariat. This is not a nice way of cooperation with the Comintern (SH). We only feel contempt for this, especially since our founder and leader of the Comintern (SH) wrote this article for you at your request. "Matin Rouge" has misused our friendship, and we do not let them escape unscathed! They have to pay for their crimes ! And here is another "mystery":

"Matin Rouge" has never told us details why there have been internal organizational disputes.

We have often asked about their assessment of the class struggle in Morocco, too. But "Matin Rouge" has left us in the dark. Why should we not know (as their friends) anything about all this?



"Matin Rouge" and their opportunism in the organizational question.

(organizational criticism)

The prerequisite of victory of socialism are not only the objective factor, but also the subjective factor, especially the communist party. The group "Matin Rouge" is not a Bolshevik party. "Matin Rouge" wants to restore an obsolete national type of communist parties in Africa, which has become useless under today's conditions of the globalized world.

Today, the globalized rule of world imperialism can only be overthrown by the socialist world revolution, led by the globalized unification of the proletarians of all countries (including Morocco) in a Communist International, the highest form of the class organization of the world proletariat.

Today the world proletariat needs the Section of a world party in every country without exception. „Matin Rouge“ knows all this but in spite - created their own party independent from the world party.

Today, Morocco does not need a national party for leading a "national democratic revolution". In the contrary, it is about creating an international army of the world proletariat. To this end, the Stalinist Hoxhaists in Morocco have to make their internationalist contribution by starting to build up the Moroccan Section of the Comintern (SH) instead of founding a party in opposition to the world party. Only the Moroccan Section of the Comintern (SH), under the leadership of the Comintern (SH), is capable of leading the Moroccan proletariat to the victory of the socialist revolution, and no one else, not even "Matin Rouge".

"Matin Rouge" is an organization that has never had the aim to establish the Moroccan Section of the Comintern (SH). "Matin Rouge" turned out to be a nationalist petty-bourgeois organization which has tried to thwart that the Comintern (SH) "enters Moroccan soil."

With their selfwilled foundation, "Matin Rouge" has made it clear to us that a Section of the Comintern (SH) in Morocco is undesirable.

They prefer the titoist way of the "specifically national road to socialism", because Matin Rouge does not need a Communist International to implement its "national democratic revolution". They do not need a Section of the Bolshevik, proletarian world party that leads the Moroccan proletariat to the socialist revolution.

"Matin Rouge" swears black and blue that they are "anti-Maoists". Is that true? No, it isn't.

In reality, they act no different than Mao. Mao said, "The Comintern, what do they care about our Chinese revolution? The Comintern is detrimental to our national-democratic revolution. They have no right to interfere with our internal affairs from outside. "

Is there any propaganda or even revolutionary actions of "Matin Rouge" against the Chinese imperialists on Moroccan soil? No, it never happened. Precious "anti-Maoists"!

In their "national democratic revolution" capitalism remains unaffected, and thus Matin Rouge tolerates the legalization of the imperialist exploitation of Morocco. They do not want to learn from the history of the Maoist invasion into Africa! They ignore the fact that the liberation from imperialist enslavement of Morocco can only be guaranteed by the socialist world revolution which cannot be led by Matin Rouge", but only by the Comintern (SH).

And what does all this has to do with proletarian internationalism? Nothing.

The proletarian internationalism which the Comintern (SH) has indeed proved for Morocco has been misused by "Matin Rouge" only for their selfish, egositic interests.

We always worked only for them, but they did not want to do anything for the Comintern (SH). A "terrific" proletarian internationalism is this, indeed! This is precisely a "proletarian internationalism", which is just according the taste of the petty-bourgeoisie: putting the internationalist proletariat in front of the cart of narrow-minded nationalism.

The workers of every country realize that their victory is possible only through their unification in a proletarian world organization. It is only the petty-bourgeois intellectuals who do not want to understand this because they are worried about the loss of their nationalist leadership.

Petty-bourgeois intellectuals refuse to march in unison with the world organization of the world proletariat. In contrats, the proletariat joins selflessly and without problems the ranks of the proletarian world army. To this disciplined proletarian attitude, petty-bourgeois intellectuals are not capable because of their intermediate class position of wavering between the decisive classes of the society, namely the proletariat and the bourgeoisie. The essence of the petty bourgeoisie is to break ranks and step out of line. Thus, "Matin Rouge" oscillates between Comintern (SH) and the Neo revisionists, without being able to decide for one side or the other. They can not possibly subordinate themselves to the proletariat, and that is the reason why they violate the hegemony of the proletariat at all fronts of the class struggle. Their petty-bourgeois consciousness, this is the class root for their centrism. The centrism secures "Matin Rouge" the freedom to bind itself to nothing and no one and to defy everything and everyone. Their opportunism allows them any non-bindingness of decisions. They are everywhere and nowhere. They do not only fera the power of the bourgeoisie but also the power of the proletariat.

The centrism of "Matin Rouge" corresponds to the intermediate position of the petty-bourgeoisie which runs between the class fronts. That is why their centrism is condemned to be squashed between the proletariat and the bourgeoisie - sooner or later. That is the unavoidable fate of "Matin Rouge".

For "Matin Rouge" the student movement is the "leading revolutionary subject" and not the working class in the alliance with the poor peasants.

"Matin Rouge" follows the tail of the movement, instead of leading the movement (at least ideologically in the beginning). It is the fate of the student movement (which is not an independent class-movement campared with the proletarian class movement!) to end in the arms of the bourgeois camp, if the working class does not have the leadership in the class struggle, if the student movement does not support the workers's class-movement.

The workers' movement will continue to evolve despite defeats, even if the student movement has long since been dissolved. The working class is the leading force without which the socialist revolution and the construction of socialism are impossible. Without the dictatorship of the proletariat, all the achievements of the people's liberation struggle cannot be guaranteed. Every revolution in Morocco has meant that the old exploiting class has been replaced by a new exploiting class. The proletarian revolution is the only revolution in Morocco that will abolish the entire class society and make its restoration impossible.
Only communism offers the Moroccan people a happy future in a classless society.


What will happen after the separation from the group "Matin Rouge"?

(Outlook into the future)

Will the Comintern (SH) continue to support the Moroccan proletariat solidly in the fight for the socialist revolution? Yes, namely unconditionally. The Comintern (SH) remains on the side of the Moroccan proletariat in internationalist solidarity.

Will the Comintern (SH) continue to support the student movement in Morocco? Yes, but this depends on the student movement itself, if it supports the struggle working class not only in words but also in deeds.

We stand by our word. We do not leave in the lurch the true revolutionaries in Morocco and in any other country.

"Matin Rouge" will continue to try to exert its petty-bourgeois influence on the working class in Morocco. We can only give our solidarity support from the outside. It is by itself that the Moroccan working class frees itself from the influence of petty bourgeois ideology, led by the Moroccan Section of the Comintern (SH). This also applies to the proletariat of all other countries.

It is a common proletarian task of class struggle which is led by the Comintern (SH) on a world scale.
The purification of anti-Communist elements from our international revolutionary ranks is inevitable in the global class struggle and imperative for the socialist world revolution.

The separation of false "friends" in Morocco is not our first separation and will not be the last separation either. In our 50 years of struggle, there have been many separations without which we would no longer exist today. A Bolshevik party does not deserve its name if it does not have the courage and the strength to expell the opportunists. We will never hesitate to beat the opportunist on the head. Opportunists get what they deserve!

The separation of false "friends" is good for the revolution and not bad.

Through the separation of false "friends", the awareness of the working class is sharpened; the development of the revolution is strengthened and not weakened.

The purification of foreign class-elements is a developmental principle of the protection of the proletarian class movement. We develop the proletarian ideology especially in the class struggle against foreign class-elements.

Our separation from "Matin Rouge" is thus a valuable lesson for the Moroccan working class and the Moroccan revolution. But also in general, for all countries.

One must always and everywhere be vigilant and not be deceived by words. Revisionism, which is wrapped in beautiful "Stalinist-Hoxhaist" gift paper, remains revisionism.

The working class must not be deceived by words, but must assess the revolutionaries according to their revolutionary deeds. The proletarian class consciousness develops only on a higher level, if, first, the proletarian ideology is in accordance with reality and, second, if it is correctly applied in revolutionary practice.

We are optimistic about the future of the revolution in Morocco because we believe in the victory of the working class, which will inevitably come - despite all obstacles, despite all false “friends”. For us, separation is an obstacle on the road to the socialist revolution that we have cleared out of the way.

This is an act of proletarian internationalism with which we express our unshakable confidence in the Moroccan working class and true Morrocan revolutionaries..

What would happen to the Moroccan revolution if remains misled by their traitors? If the Moroccan people want to free themselves, it has to chase their wrong "friends" to the devil. Of course, the Moroccan working class will not blame us for the separation of "Matin Rouge". On the contrary, the Moroccan workers will appreciate that we have separated from false "friends".

The revolution cleans itself.

Every revolution goes through a cleansing process from beginning to end. Thus also the revolution in Morocco does.

First, the revolution begins to grow through the protesting masses. At the beginning of the revolution there are many "friends" among the masses. But the revolution continues to evolve by throwing overboard one opportunist after another who tries to stop or mislead it. Liberated from opportunist illusions, the revolutionary consciousness of the masses will rise faster and faster.

At the end of this process, the revolution has become mature and such a driving force that it is strong enough to involve those social forces who do not betray the revolution on its way to victory. The victory of the revolution is impossible without its own conscious purification process.

The separation of "Matin Rouge" is part of the cleaning process of the Moroccan revolution. With this separation in Morocco, a process is taking place in which the revolutionary proletarian movement frees itself from petty bourgeois influence. The Moroccan revolution of 2011 thus achieves a higher quality. When the Moroccan working class was at the margins of other active forces in the year 2011, then the working class will find the way to the leadership of the Moroccan revolution in ever new learning processes, turning it into a proletarian revolution.

The victory of the socialist revolution in Morocco is inevitable. But to win, the Moroccan working class needs its leadership, the Moroccan section of the Comintern (SH).

We call on all the revolutionary workers in Morocco: Contact the Comintern (SH)! We will help you build the Moroccan Section - also against the resistance of "Matin Rouge"!

Forward to the socialist revolution in Morocco!

Forwardto the establishment of the dictatorship of the proletariat in Morocco!

Long live socialist Morocco in a socialist world!

Forward with the construction of the Moroccan section of the Comintern (SH)!

Long live the socialist world revolution and the dictatorship of the world proletariat!

Long live world socialism and world communism!

Long live Marx, Engels, Lenin, Stalin and Enver Hoxha!

Long live Stalinism-Hoxhaism!

Long live the Comintern (SH)!


Decision of the Comintern (SH)

22nd of October 2017


- Theoretical Organ -

Communist International (Stalinist - Hoxhaists)