What is Marxism-Leninism now - 80 years after the death of Lenin?

Marxism-Leninism

of today

is the actual application of Marx`and Lenin`s ideas and struggles

for anti-revisionist and anti-socialrevengeist Socialism,

for the Reconquest of the Proletarian Dictatorship,

for the Reconstruction of Socialist Countries,

for the Renaissance and Renewal of Socialism,

for a higher stage of the World-Revolution towards World-Socialism

in the Epoch of Imperialism and Proletarian Revolution









in commemoration of Comrade

Lenin

- on occasion of his 80th death day -





Neo- revisionism or Leninism?



Leninism is World Bolshevism, is Marxism of the epoch of imperialism and the proletarian revolution, emphasized Stalin.

The revolution is a problem which has to be solved practically, today – has to be solved in the continuation of the struggle against the imperialist-revisionist world, emphasized Enver Hoxha.

So, if you defend Leninism today,

you have to continue the defence of Stalin and Enver Hoxha !

The revolutionary reconquest of socialism from the imperialist-revisionist world – this is today the historical Leninist stage and definition of the epoch of imperialism and the proletarian revolution,

It is the present demarcation-line between Neo-Revisionism and Marxism-Leninism.

This is the significance and understanding of Leninism-today, is – for short – the base for the realization of the ideological, political and organisational general line of the CominternML to lead the internationalist, socialist class struggle of the world proletariat in combination with the revolutionary liberation struggle of the suppressed and exploited peoples of the world towards communism.







Let`s close the Leninists` ranks all over the world!

Let`s fight wisely, courageously, disciplinedly, unwaveringly, firm-principledly for the defence of the great bequest of Lenin.

Leninism is the invincible ideology of the worldproletariat which shall lead to communism!

High and higher the Leninist banner of victory!

On occasion of Lenin`s 80th day of death the CominternML calls on all Marxist - Leninists, Communists, revolutionaries in the whole world to defend the revolutionary ideas and the revolutionary work of comrade Lenin. Let us fight against imperialism and opportunism for the triumph of the world revolution and socialism on the whole globe – as Lenin did it exemplarily and excellently.

80 years ago – on the 21st of January, 1924 - comrade Lenin died, the most outstanding Marxist who followed after Karl Marx and Frederik Engels and who continued and developed brilliantly their Marxist revolutionary ideas and works. Lenin transformed Marxism from the West to the East and applied it masterly and successfully under the conditions of Russia. Comrade Lenin was the founder and master of Bolshevism, the leader of the Bolshevist party, the leader of the Great Socialist October Revolution, the founder and architect of the first socialist state on the world in which the dictatorship of the proletariat came true. Comrade Lenin was the founder and leader of the glorious Communist International, the leader of the world proletariat and all the suppressed people in the whole world. Lenin rang in the epoch of the downfall of world capitalism and the triumphal march of the socialist revolution towards world socialism. Lenin was the leader of the world revolution.

Lenin is immortal.

He lives further in the heart of every revolutionary worker, of every communist.

Leninism is today more then ever before a sharp weapon and enormous force in the hands and brains of the world proletariat - the grave-digger of world capitalism. Leninism is a sharp weapon against all class enemies whether they fight with open or disguised coat of mail.





Who is a true Leninist nowadays ?

Is everybody, who simply calls himself a „Leninist“, really a true Leninist? Our answer is: No. To differ true Leninists from socalled „Leninists“ is a question of sharp ideological class-struggle between the revolutionary proletariat and the reactionary bourgeoisie: a class-struggle between the Marxist-Leninists against „Leninists“ in words and anti-Leninists in deeds.

It was Lenin who liberated the true Marxists from the socalled „Marxists“ of the 2nd International in the struggle against opportunism and social-chauvinism. It was Stalin, who liberated the true Leninists from the Trotzkyites, Bucharinusts etc. , who called themsevels „Leninists“ and „Bolshevists“, and all the other backward forces of the bourgeoisie, who struggled for the dissolution of socialism and the restoration of capitalism. It was Enver Hoxha, who liberated the true Stalinists from the modern revisionists in the struggle for the strengthening of socialism and revolution under conditions of the imperialist-revisionist encirclement after Stalin`s death. It is our turn to liberate Enver Hoxha from the neo-revisionists in the struggle for the revolutionary liberation of socialism from the imperialist-revisionist world.


So, who is the true Leninist of today?


The true Leninist is - at first and above all - that follower of Lenin who became a classic of Marxism-Leninism in the fight for the successful defence and further development of Leninism - comrade Stalin ! It is impossible to defend Leninism against Stalin. Struggling against Stalin means nothing else then struggling against Lenin. Leninism fails without the teachings of his follower Stalin. Those who put this truth in question, those who call themselves „defenders of Leninism against Stalinism“ can be revisionists, Trotzkyites, whatever, however never true Leninists. They are Leninists in words and anti-Leninists in deeds. The most dangerous anti-Leninism is disguised behind the mask of „Leninism“. It is nothing else then the futile attempt of the bourgeoisie to prolong and maintain its dictatorship respectively to re-conquer it after its loss. So if you want to become a true Leninist, you must study and apply the teachings of Stalin who developed Leninism masterly. You must be a good, a true Stalinist in the best meaning of this term, if you want to be a defender of Leninism.

But how can you really be a good Leninist and as well a good Stalinist, if you don`t defend them against modern revisionism, Maoism, Neo-Trotzkyism and all the other branches of bourgeois ideology which are masked with „Leninism“, today? You really cannot defend Lenin and Stalin, if you do not defend Enver Hoxha, the greatest Leninist after the death of Stalin, the fifth classic of Marxism-Leninism. A Neo-revisionist is somebody who struggles against Marxism-Leninism behind the shield of the 5 classics. History of international class-struggle proves that the bourgeoisie always masked its reactionary ideology behind the older classics to struggle against the younger classics, thus with the only intention to struggle against Marxism-Leninism in a whole.

When the revolutionary social democrats fell into the minority as a left wing of the majority of the opportunist social democracy in the beginning of the 20th century, it was Lenin who defended Marxism and supported the international Marxist Left by his gigantic fight against the anti-Marxist betrayal of the international social democracy. And it was Stalin who supported the international Bolshevics in the struggle against the anti-Leninist revisionists,Trotzyites etc. And it was Enver Hoxha who supported the Marxist-Leninists in the struggle against the modern revisionists, the socialfascists and socialimperialists. So, a true Leninist of today is a communist who continues the struggle of the 5 classics against the influence of the bourgeoisie`s agency within the ranks of the international communist and proletarian movement, who continues the struggle against revisionism, that casted its skin to Neo- revisionism - in the meantime. A true Leninist of today struggles against the class enemies who mask as „Marxist-Leninists“ to hinder the come back of Marxism-Leninism, to paralyze the anti-revisionist struggle, to paralyze the anti-socialrevengeist struggle against socialfascism and socialimperialism. The new term of „Social-Revengeism“ should express the revenge-striving of the revisionists to reconquer, to regain or to maintain their social-fascist and socialimperialist dictatorship masked by Marxist-Leninist phraseology to save worldimperialism by a socalled „renewed socialism – purified from revisionism“ based on the „theory of the selfregulation of revisionism“, on „theories of capitalism`s maintenance by bourgois socialism“ based on the impossible premise to return a revisionist country into a socialist country without the violent socialist proletarian revolution, without the smashing of the revisionist bourgeoisie and its exploitational and oppressive system, based on the impossible premise that the bourgeoisie could be able to change bourgeois socialism into proletarian socialism. The bourgeoisie of the revisionist countries shall never „overcome“ its historical revisionist faults by „return to the true roots of traditional Marxism-Leninism, to the roots of the teachings of the classics“. The social, political, ideogogical, economical and organisational base of world wide social-revengeism is concentrated and centralized in the still existing international foxholes of the revisionist, socialfascist and socialimperialist countries. The aims of the social-revengeism is to rebuild the revisionist bullwark against the socialist world revolution and against the establishment of the dictatorship of the world proletariat, against the Marxist-Leninist worldmovement, against genuine socialist countries established respectively re-established according to the further development of the prototypes of Lenin` and Stalin`s Soviet Union and Enver Hoxha`s Albania. The fraudulent premise of Neo-Revisionism is the suspicious ability to „prove“, that revisionism is „able to turn back“ to Marxism-Leninism. We as Leninists know by our own experiences that it is impossible to overcome revisionism by „criticism and self-criticism“, by „radical“ reformations, by „united fronts“, by declarations of „solidarity“, by recreations of „revolutionary Marxist-Leninist outfit“, by „bolshevization of revisionism“ or whatever. If we earnestly want to overcome revisionism, we have to sharpen the demarcation line between revisionism and Marxism-Leninism and to destroy the influence of revisionism completely by its roots no matter what kind of new „revolutionary“ clothes revisionism shall wear. We have to dash the revisionists to the ground, routhlessly. Revisionism can never be transformed to Marxism-Leninism. Even the Neo-Revisionists themselves aren `t convinced of this absurdity, but they want to make the proletariat stupid. Neo-Revisionism is only a lure to „liberate“ the proletarians from capitalist irons, but in reality Neo- revisionism is only a further attempt to chain them up more and more.

It is already an unrenouncable component of the bourgeoisie tactics even to missuse the fifth classic of Marxism-Leninism, comrade Enver Hoxha, with the intention to maintain the dictatorship of the bourgeoisie. The bourgeoisie shall never make a voluntary surrender. The counter-revolution is forced to creep into the teachings of comrade Enver Hoxha as long as we Hoxhaists exist, as long as we are a danger for the capitalist system. As long as we Marxist-Leninists continue the revolutionary struggle of comrade Enver Hoxha, the bourgeoisie is obliged to paralyze our Hoxhaist struggle. Enver Hoxha thwarted the intention of the modern revisionists to bring disrepute upon comrade Stalin. And it is our turn to thwart the intention of the Neo-revisionists to bring disrepute upon comrade Enver Hoxha.

When Marx died there was Engels. When Engels died there was Lenin. When Lenin died there was Stalin. When Stalin died there was Enver Hoxha. But when Enver Hoxha died, who was then there? We true Hoxhaists were there and we shall still be there as long as our heart shall beat! We are alone there, because there is neither a new Marx, nor a new Engels, nor a new Lenin, nor a new Stalin or nor a new Enver Hoxha who continues the development of Marxism-Leninism, who continues the leadership of the revolutionary world communist and world proletarian movement towards communism. So there is no other way to stay on our own feet led by the teachings of the 5 classics of Marxism-Leninism. And doubtedless there will be born new leaders of Marxism-Leninism in our struggle to finish the revolutionary mission of the world proletariat. There is no time to wait for a new follower of the classics. We have to base our struggle on the 5 classics and we have to develop their teachings by our own, self-reliantly, in demarcation of all the revisionist influences of the world bourgeoisie. The classics proved this successfully in history and it is our turn to prove it today. We Marxist-Leninists are never at our wit`s end. We Marxist-Leninists are able and willing to bring the worldproletariat to the donwfall of worldimperialism to an victorious end on the base of the further development of the teachings of Marx, Engels, Lenin, Stalin and Enver Hoxha !


At the latest with the events of the downfall of the socialist Albania we participants of Enver Hoxha`s World Movement together with the true defenders of Enver Hoxha in Albania who survived the counter-revolution there and who still resist bravely the counter-revolutionary influence of the new revisionists in Albania became conscious about the new situation, that there were none but themselves who continue the bequest of comrade Enver Hoxha. And we started to rebuild the revolutionary movement in the spirit of Enver Hoxha as a minority among the majority of renegades and capitulants oncoming to Neo-revisionism. There were not only the neo-revisionist Clique of Ramiz Alia who took advantage of our confidence in defending comrade Enver Hoxha after his death ( as the Chrushchevites did with Stalin to overthrow the Soviet-Union). With lips-service and personal-cult towards Lenin and Stalin the modern revisionists destroyed the Soviet-Union and again with lips-service and personal-cult towards Enver Hoxha the Neo-revisionists destroyed the socialist Albania of Enver Hoxha to sell it for a mess of pottage to the world-imperialists. However, the world imperialists are conscious about the fact, that this will not be the end of the story. They notice very well that the people of Albania and in the former Soviet Union shall not bear the betrayal as a destiny – without any resistance. The world imperialists in cooperation with the internal new bourgeoisie in these countries are therefore forced to rebuild a renewed revisionist bullwark against the danger of the reconquest of the proletarian dictatorship. The world bourgeoisie is obliged to penetrate into the revolutionary movement of the revival of the socialist revolution in Albania and the former Soviet Union, with the aim to occupy the head of the revolutionary movement, the head of the revolutionary organisations to behead them in defence of world imperialism. This is the only reason why the world bourgeoisie recruits a new upper leading group of „communist“ aristocracy in the struggle against the upcoming of new communist, revolutionary leaders and organisations all over the world. For the recruitment of a „communist“ aristocracy the world bourgeoisie does not confine itself upon the bullwark-centers of the revisionist countries, but simultaneously the counter-revolution tries to penetrate directly into the centers of the ongoing revolutionary communist movement and its efforts to rebuild and reorganize true Marxist-Leninist parties and organisations, too. The true Leninists of today have to be conscious about these attempts of the world bourgeoisie and they have to put the neccessary conclusions and measures to thwart these attempts. If the world bourgeoisie refers to the former victories of the revisionists, we Leninists have to refer to the victories of Leninism to thwart the upcoming new wave of world-revisionism.


The history of the communist world movement proved again and again: Whenever a communist leader died, the class-enemies in our communist ranks uncovered their mask and continued their counter-revolutionary struggle with open attacks against communism and against our communist leaders.

There were also neo-revisionists who took advantage of our confidence to defend comrade Enver Hoxha against the Albanian traitors. We needed a lot of time to look through those who only snatched at the banner of comrade Enver Hoxha to deceive us. The aim of these traitors is to missuse the bequest of comrade Enver Hoxha for the same old aims: destruction of Marxism-Leninism, destruction of socialism, destruction of the socialist revolution, hold-back of the rebuilding of a new Hoxhaist World Movement, hold-back of the reconquest of socialism and the reconstruction of the proletarian dictatorship in defence of capitalism. It is clear, that they deny and contest our blames on them, that the traitors shall try to turn the tables on just to uphold their mask. So we have the duty to demask them uninterruptedly and completely. We should never under-estimate or even play down the danger of Neo-revisionism as the reconciliators do to drift us into the arms of the revisionists. Strategically revisionism is a stinking dead body of world imperialism, but tactically we should not under-estimate the danger of the still existing remainders of revisionism which are able and decided to cast its skin within the new upcoming of the anti-imperialist resistance, within the reorganisation of the struggle for proletarian socialism. The neo-revisionism is a lethal poison within the ranks of the revolutionary movement of today. It is the continuation of the struggle between Revisionism and Marxism-Leninism – a struggle alive or dead. Neo-revisionism or Leninism ? – this is the question which decides on the future of communism.

With the upbuilding of the new CominternML the Marxist-Leninists are now re-organizing the international forces to solve this problem. And we swear on the 80th death day of comrade Lenin that Leninism shall win this fight against Neo-revisionism !


No arbitrariness, no betrayal and no demagogy can subdue the revolutionary work of Lenin, Leninism is unbeatable.

But what does this mean ?

Does this mean to misunderstand Leninism as pure, mechanical book-learning? We Marxist-Leninists have always been adversaries of literally „Leninism“ just as we are adversaries of the neo-revisionist restoration of personal-cult around Lenin, in particular on occassion of his death – and birthdays. Does this mean to „defend“ Leninism as a religion and not as a guidance of our revolutionary class-struggle against the bourgeoisie ? Does this mean to conserve Leninism, to prevent it from bourgeois „infections“ by putting Leninism on ice? Does this mean to nail Leninism down under Lenin`s coffin-lid ? Does this mean to work out new updates of dogmata to satisfy the insatiable eagerness of „progressive historians“- the lackeys of the bourgeoisie?. Does that mean that the bequest of Leninism belongs to bourgeois „science“ and not to the science of the exploited and oppressed classes ? Does that mean to separate Leninism in political, theoretical and ideological „leaders“ of the intellectuals of the petty-bourgeoisie to „guide“ the economic struggle of the workers, who are too „stupid“ to understand politics, theory and ideology?

No, Leninism can only survive and develop, if we permanently purify it from bourgeois-revisionist influence, if we destroy all the revisionist attempts to change the Leninist revolutionary weapon into a counter-revolutionary weapon of the bourgeoisie against the proletariat and the Marxist-Leninists.

The Leninists already poved historically the victory of the combination of the workers movement and the socialist theory in the struggle AGAINST „revolutionary“ intellectualism and economism!

The oppressed and exploited classes of the capitalist system – and in the first line the revolutionary class of the proletariat - already proved historically to the world that they successfully changed their life by Leninism, that they victoriously applied to this science of revolution, the science of liberation from exploitation and oppression and moreover that they established their own socialist scociety without exploitation and oppression. This is the reason why the revisionists are never able to hinder the exploited and oppressed classes to realize the future communist, classless society by Leninism.


What do the Neo-revisionists do?

They follow the premise of the bourgeois ideology that Marxism-Leninism stands still after the fall of the Albanian socialist country. So they cling to the still existing revisionist countries as their „homelands“ which have to be „protected from worldimperialism“ and they make big noise to save „socialism“ (revisionism) by different „fronts of unity and solidarity“. The truth is, that they only save the dead stinking body of revisionism, that they only save capitalism by which they hinder us Leninists to reconquer the lost proletarian socialism. The upholding of the still existing bourgeois socialism is, however, no measure of steps to defend a „bullwark against imperialism“ as they promise, but measures of steps against the reconquest of the bullwark of proletarian socialism, against the bullwark of developed and perfected Marxism-Leninism, against the bullwark of the world revolution. The bullwark of proletarian socialism and Marxism-Leninism can only be re-established by the destruction of the bullwark of the bourgeois revisionist countries and by the destruction of revisionism in general. The revisionists shall fail to uphold Marxism-Leninism as a science that „stands still“, and which does not develop and that shall finally be burried by capitalism. The revisionists shall fail in their attempts to hinder us Leninists that we shall enrich Leninism by new experiences, new knowledges, new analysis, conclusions and generalizations of the ongoing international class-struggle. Some of the formulas and conclusions of the times of Lenin cannot but change in the course of 80 years after his death, cannot but be replaced by new formulas and conclusions of the struggle against Neo-revisionism, corresponding to the new historical tasks of the world revolution to reconquer socialism and protect it by the establishment of world socialism. Leninism does not recognize invariable conclusions and formulas, obligatory for all epochs and periods, Leninism is the enemy of all dogmatism and vulgarism – as the pair of revisionist twins. We as Leninists know well, that dogmatic and secterian methods are methods of the bourgeoisie directed against Leninism. And just in the recent times – when the archives of the former Soviet Union were „opened“ [there was made much noise, but where are the really results which would help the revolutionary world proletariat to step forward??], the bourgeoisie makes efforts for new anti-communist „sensational disclosures“ , further mental food for poisoning Leninism. We as Leninists cannot ignore what`s going on with the new archive-materials in the hands of our class-enemies. We have to master the challenge to take advantage of the „new insights“, determined, willing and able to use them as an enrichment for enlightening the continuation of our Leninist path towards the victory of the proletarian revolution. The bourgeoisie is not so stupid to give us guidance and help to master the new knowledges about Leninist history. And the bourgeoisie is not so stupid to be satisfied with the impediment of our access to the archive-materials. The bourgeoisie is clever enough to take advantage of the opportunity to falsify the historical documents, to prepare them as a weapon in their hands against the worldproletariat and the world revolution. The historical archive-documents are food for the revisionists to cast their skins, are fundamental for the further developent of Neo-revisionism. The historical truth, that we Leninists bring to light, is dangerous for the revisionists, because we shall continue to demask them with new historical materials , and we shall find – for sure ! - new proves for the betrayal of the revisionists. It will be certainly a running match with the time to demask and disarm Neo-revisionism before it is able and strong enough to poison the revolutionary world movement. The course of class-struggle will show: who – whom?


Comrades !

Never forget that we cannot stand still with our correct Marxist sentence: It`s not a matter of interpretation of the world but to change it. History of the bourgeoisie turned out, that the exploiting and oppressing classes were never satisfied with interpretations of the world. The oppressing and exploiting classes had always been those classes who used knowledges, science and all mental powers of the society as the superstructure for the upbuilding and strengthening of the class-rulership of their economical exploitation-system. The bourgeoisie has proved historically that it was possible by revisionism to restore capitalism and to interrupt the development of the proletarian revolution after the October-Revolution - with the exception of the victorious Albanian revolution – nota bene : the revisionist countries still exist „in the name“ and under the mask of Leninism and anti-Leninist ideologies – as Maoism for example – are still active „in the name“ of Leninism ! Although a „Pyrrhus-victory“ – it was indeed a defeat of the Leninists and an interim - victory of the bourgeoisie. So, if we want to be true Leninists of today, we have to prove to the world, that, if it was possible to restore capitalism, then it will be also possible to restore socialism! Consequently, Leninism of today is the science of the restoration of socialism, is the science of the restoration of the dictatorship of the proletariat, is the science of the liberation of the historical, proletarian achievments from revisionism. Leninism is stronger then revisionism in the end. We Leninists of today shall win the last and final battle of the reconquest of socialism because the future belongs to the world proletariat. It is impossible to tear the weakest chain from worldimperialism, today, if we do not win the struggle against Neo-Revisionism. It is impossible, today, to defend Leninism without the destruction of the neo-revisionist influence of the world-bourgeoisie within the ranks of the Marxist- Leninist and revolutionary workers movement of the world. To withhold Leninism from the world-proletariat is not only restricted by cruel and fascist methods of prohibition, of burning books of Lenin, but this method is combined with the falsification of Lenin`s books, is combined with methods to deceive the proletariat. Vulgarism and populism was not only practised by the bourgeoisie after the death of Marx and Engels (vulgarisation of Marxism). Vulgarism was also practized in times after the death of Lenin. The vulgarism of Leninism is a dangerous weapon against the world-proletariat. Presumably the revisionists shall re-activate the vulgarism of Marxism-Leninism in the imminent time of the revival of the proletarian revolution. So it is our duty as true Leninists to thwart the intentions of the revisionists, to snatch the banner of Lenin to baffle the reconquest of the proletarian dictatorship. So, today we are only true Leninists, if we master Leninism as a guidance for the reconquest of proletarian socialism and the destruction of bourgeois, revisionist socialism. Comrades, don `t forget that the still existing revisionist countries are a dangerous reservoir of the world bourgeoisie to produce new barriers AGAINST the proletarian world revolution, AGAINST the reconquest of proletarian socialism, AGAINST Leninism! This international reservoir of the revisionist countries has to be isolated, drained and discharged because it is a reservoir of poison for the Marxist-Leninist and worldproletarian movement. The revisionist countries want to get the Marxist-Leninist world movement as their cart-horse ! Every reconciliation and opportunism towards Neo-revisionism fills up this poisoned reservoir – is counter-revolutionary! This truth we have to teach the world proletariat in the daily international class-struggle.


Enver Hoxha and Stalin have proved the correctness of Leninism in word and deed historically, they have proved that the revisionism is completely avoidable, if the communist party remains faithful to the revolutionary principles, pursues a right Bolshevist line, holds on determinedly to the policy of the class struggle and all measures seizes to turn a bourgeous degeneration off from the very start. The Marxism - Leninism is stronger than all revisionist flows of the world which isn't only a quantitative but also a qualitative question.


In the opinion of the CominternML the most dangerous flow of the Neo revisionism of today is to betray Enver Hoxha - namely that flow which pretends to defend in words Enver Hoxha against revisionism but who does just the opposite in deeds. Ramiz Alia and his Neo-revisionist group must be called in first place here, but also flows within today's Marxist- Leninist world movement which has exposed the traitor to Ramiz Alia in words but has followed his steps in practice.The Neo revisionists go this treacherous way for the only reason to distort the teachings of the classics Marx, Engels, Lenin, Stalin and Enver Hoxha, to reject the principles of Marxism-Leninism.

Without the tactics of Neo-revisionism it is impossible for the bourgeoisie to slide our movement furtherhin into revisionist ways, because Neo-revisionism is masked with „anti-revisionism“. Neo-revisionism is anti-revisionism in words, but revisionism in deeds.

Lenin considered the smashing of the bourgeoisie and the establishment of the dictatorship of the proletariat not as the end, but as the beginning of the socialist world revolution which develops uninteruptedly during the whole historical period of the transformation from capitalism to communism – and we are just still in the beginning process of the socialist proletarian world revolution.

As long as this gigantic transformation of the world society is not completely realized – Lenin emphasized - the increasing gravity of the international class-struggle shall develop steadily but in a manner of the world revolution`s ebb and flow. The aim is exactly to follow this straight revolutionary line of development of the world revolution until the time when the complete victory will be obtained (not to be mixed up with the trott behind the rotten line of the still existing revisionist countries which lead the world proletariat back to new „models“ of capitalism!). The main weapons in this struggle are genuine Communist parties and their unification in the genuine Communist International. And they are needed urgently to conquer the proletarian dictatorship – respectively to re-conquer it on an national as well on the international scale by the continuation of the class-struggle of the proletariat.

Leninism is not only the teaching, how the proletariat can liberate from world capitalism, but moreover how to overcome opportunism and revisionism by which the capitalist-revisionist world tries to hinder the proletariat building up proletarian socialism in demarcation of bourgeois socialism. Under the leadership of Lenin the socialist ideas were realized in spite of opportunism and revisionism. He worked out a concret plan for the upbuilding of socialism and laid down the way to communism in general outlines.

All the victories of socialism were achieved on the theoretical base of Leninism. And there will be no socialism in future which will not be based on Leninism. All those „socialist theories“ who deny or reject Leninist socialism are condemned to fail. All the „socialist“ countries of today are not countries of Leninist socialism. They are revisionist remainders, dead bodies which cannot be saved by inspirations with Leninism, allthough the revisionist leaders of these countries assert this. They shall not fall by themselves as long as they are neccessary for the world bourgeoisie to deceive the world proletariat and the oppressed and exploited peoples.

Only if the worldproletariat and the oppressed and exploited peoples shall learn by their own experiences that the still existing revisionist countries are not at all socialist, then the world proletariat and the oppressed and exploited peoples shall liberate from imperialism and socialimperialism, from fascism and social-fascism .

Stalin and Enver Hoxha worked out concret plans how to resist the restoration of capitalism, how to resist the encirclement of the capitalist world and the capitalist-revisionist world consequently and effectively. They only succeeded to transform their plans into practice, because both of them relied completely on Leninism.

The CominternML has worked out plans, how to reconquer socialism that was lost to capitalism, how to destroy the revisionist remainders completely and how to give them no chance to survive by new injections of capitalism, how to build up a new socialism on the ruins of the smashed revisionist countries, how to smash world imperialism and social-imperialism on an international scale. The CominternML worked out the „General Line of the strategy and tactics of the continuation of the proletarian socialist world revolution“ that started with Lenin`s victorious October Revolution.

Under the leadership of comrade Enver Hoxha the capitalist-revisionist world was not able to smash Albanian socialism and to sweep socialism off the globe.

His struggle and teachings resisted the attacks of all revisionist branches all over the world including the revisionist branch of Maoism. The teachings of Comrade Enver Hoxha are therefore the guarantee of the protection and development of the Marxism-Leninism of today. The teachings of Enver Hoxha are the teachings of Marxism-Leninism of today.

Leninism survived by the teachings of comrade Stalin and comrade Enver Hoxha. If you seperate Leninism from Stalin and Enver Hoxha you destroy Leninism, you burry Leninism. This is just the intention of the neo-revisionists – burrying Leninism by attacking Stalin respectiveley Enver Hoxha.

What about those comrades who followed Lenin on the road of the Marxist-Leninist world movement of comrade Enver Hoxha ? Most of them have retired and withdrew from the Marxist-Leninist world movement of comrade Enver Hoxha and suffer from the poison of neo-revisionism. Others openly became renegates, became dangerous forces who are busy to critisize the Marxist-Leninist world movement of comrade Enver Hoxha, other relapsed into reconciliation with Maoism or even became Neo-Maoists. Some other are busy to cause the Marxist-Leninist world movement of comrade Enver Hoxha to die. How can this happen?

The Marxist-Leninist world movement of comrade Enver Hoxha was a sharp weapon to wipe out the revisionists. It was clear that the revisionists did not put up with this. They re-activated their forces of resistance and mobilized all energies of defence. They put great pressure on the Marxist-Leninist world movement of comrade Enver Hoxha and this was not without effect, especially after the death of comrade Enver Hoxha and the betrayal of Ramiz Alia and his clique. The socialist Albania of comrade Enver Hoxha was the base of the worldrevolution. It was clear that the disreputation of socialism in Albania from inside as well as from outside harmed and damaged the confidence of the worldproletariat in socialism and worldrevolution.The neo-revisionist dismantling of socialism in Albania led to the weakening of the Marxist-Leninist world movement of comrade Enver Hoxha. The propaganda of the revisionists, that „socialism in Albania failed“ was also propaganda to weaken the position of communism all over the world. Ramiz Alia and his supporters all over the world helped revisionism to turn back the flywheel of the international revolutionary movement. The pretended „hundred percent Enver Hoxha - defence course“ of Ramiz Alia turned out to be a hundred percent Anti-Enver Hoxha course, a course of capitulation, a liquidatory course – a) liquidation of socialism in Albania and b) liquidation of proletarian internationalism by descending Albania as the base of the worldrevolution c) a course of renewed neo-revisionist branches ( for example the revival of Maoism: socialism in Albania failed, ergo: Enver Hoxha was „wrong“ – Mao was „right“). Alia`s distortion of Enver Hoxha was the same distortion of Leninism by Sinovjev. Stalin unmasked Sinovjev 1926 in his „Questions of Leninism“ (Stalin, Volume 8 ).

To withdraw from the strong Marxist-Leninist world movement of comrade Enver Hoxha proved in the result as a total capitulation of the anti-revisionist struggle and led by reconciliation straight into the arms of the neo-revisionists. Only a minority of determined Marxist-Leninists defended comrade Enver Hoxha and had – from then on - to cope with the pressure of the renegades who threw the teachings of comrade Enver Hoxha over board and who supported – openly or disguised - the socialfascists and social-imperialists to survive. The treacherous way from outrages against „Stalinist bureaucratical-revisionist deterioration of Leninism“ was not far from the outrage against „Hoxhaist bureaucratical-revisionist deterioration of Leninism“. However accusations such as „orthodox dogmatism of Marxism“, „orthodox dogmatism of Leninism“, „orthodox dogmatism of Stalinism“ and „orthodox dogmatism of Hoxhaism“ are all together accusations against Marxism-Leninism to isolate the true Marxist-Leninists from the proletariat and the proletarian movement, to „save the sheep from the wolves“, and to bring the proletariat back to the revisionist shepherds.

By this the neo-revisionism is the instrument of the bourgeoisie to take advantage from the anti-revisionist struggle of the Marxist-Leninist world movement of comrade Enver Hoxha, to assimilate it, to subjugate it under the bourgeois interest of oppression and exploitation. Just in the same way when the bourgeoisie took advantage of Leninism to mask the restoration of capitalism. As all former branches of opportunism the neo-revisionism is the instrument of the bourgeoisie to change the weapons of Marxism-Leninism into weapons against Marxism-Leninism.



To defend Leninism you have to unmask the anti-Leninist „Mao Tsetung Ideas“

One of the most successful instruments of the bourgeoisie to disarm the proletariat and the people are undoubtedly the anti-Leninist „Mao Tsetung Ideas“. By the „Mao Tsetung Ideas“ Chinese revisionism came to power and hindered - in fact - the establishment of the dictatorship of the proletariat, hindered Leninism to come true in China. The demaskation of the „Mao Tsetung Ideas“ was one of the most difficult struggles against the bourgeois ideology in history and which was masked by Leninism. And this struggle is not yet finished successfully. We Marxist-Leninists with comrade Enver Hoxha at the top needed decades looking through the true anti-Leninist character of the „Mao Tsetung Ideas“. In the meantime we found out that there is no single question left which the „Mao Tsetung Ideas“ do not collide with the teachings of Lenin. It is not possible and neccessary to prove the anti-Leninism on occasion of the 80th deathday of comrade Lenin sufficiently, we Marxist-Leninists have proved this by many documents, especially by the documents of comrade Enver Hoxha („Reflections on China“, „Imperialism and Revolution“, etc.).

Moreover there are some Maoists who proclaimed Mao Tsetung as a „classic of Marxism-Leninism“ and who declared the „Mao Tsetung Ideas“ as Marxism at the third and highest level“. There is a world movement which refers to the socalled „Marxism-Leninism-Maoism“. They claim to be anti-revisionist and defenders of Marxism-Leninism. The problem is the combination of Marxism-Leninism with Maoism. If the „MLM“ -ists defend Maoism, then they violate Marxism-Leninism. If they would defend Marxism-Leninism they would violate Maoism. Theories which exclude themselves cannot be combined with the intention to retrieve a higher „ fruitbearing“ result called „Marxism-Leninism-Maoism“ or whatever. If you „fructify“ the proletarian ideology with the bourgeois ideology you get not an ideology that is advantageous for all classes – as Mao Tsetung believed, when he built up a Chinese prototype of a bourgeois system which he called „socialism“ which tolerates the existence of the bourgeoisie (if it „supports“ the upbuilding of socialism- since when does the bourgeoisie support proletarian socialism?!). Leninism, in the contrary, presumes that there can be only socialism, if the bourgeoisie as a class is abolished. Leninism says definetely no to the division of the dictatorship of the proletariat with exploiting and oppressing classes. Capitalist elements are liquidated by the proletarian dictatorship, otherwise it would be anything else but not the dictatorship of the proletariat. There is no capitalist class which exploits the proletariat in Leninist socialism.The working class is owner of the productive instruments and – means. Otherwise any exploitation and suppression of the working class cannot be excluded. Lenin liberated the proletariat by the armed October-Revolution, smashed the class of the capitalists, seized the productive instruments and – means from the capitalists and abolished the private ownership of the production, which brings forth the exploited class of the proletariat. The working class of the Soviet-Union as well as the working class of Albania became a new class who smashed the capitalist system and who created the socialist ownership of the productive instruments and -means.

What about Mao and his „Culture-Revolution“ ? This revolution was neither socialist nor proletarian and is contrary to the October-Revolution and the teachings of Marx, Engels, Lenin and Stalin. It was neither led by a Bolshevist party, nor by the proletariat itself. It was an anarchist movement of parts of the army and the students against the Chinese proletariat. The roots for this were based on the „Mao Tsetung Ideas“ by which a palace-revolt was justified to get rid of some reactionaries within the party who strived for the power. The leaders of the „Culture-Revolution“ were neither Bolshevists nor proletarian leaders who struggled for the dictatorship of the proletariat on the base of Marxism-Leninism, but anti-leninist elements who struggled against other anti-leninist, fascist elements, who in the whole demaged the path towards socialism. Mao Tsetung was responsible for all this disaster, because he was the initiator of the „Culture-Revolution“.

It can also not be denied, that Mao Tsetung was wavering in the struggle against the Soviet-Revisionists. Mao initiated the reconciliation with Breshnew in the Sixtieth and it was again Mao Tsetung who collaborated with the Amarican imperialists against the Soviet rivals. Mao is the creator of the „Three-World-Theory“ which is anti-leninist. Leninism devides the world only in two parts : the capitalist and the socialist world.

Leninism is the teaching of proletarian internationalism. Lenin was the founder and leader of the Comintern and the leader of the proletarian world revolution. The „Mao Tsetung Ideas“ are in the contrary chauvinist and nationalist and paralized the world revolution. Mao Tsetung did not accept Lenin and the COMINTERN. He mostly offended against the decisions of the Comintern and comrade Stalin. The Chinese Proposal of the General Line of the Communist world movement is totally revisionist as the CominternML analysed and proved this in the „General Line of the CominternML – strategy and tactics of the socialist, proletarian world revolution“ (- in German language).

The „Mao Tsetung Ideas“ came slowly to light as a variety of revisionism, beginning before the Second World War, especially after 1935, when Mao came to power. On the 9th Congress of the CP China the „Mao Tsetung Ideas“ were proclaimed as a „higher stage of Marxism-Leninism“. In a letter to Tschiang Tsching, written on the 8th of July, 1966 Mao explained, that the right wing can use the Mao Tsetung Ideas to get the power for a course of time as well as the left wing, who can use the Mao Tsetung Ideas“ to smash the right wing. This proves that Mao Tsetung was no Leninist. The „Mao Tsetung Ideas“ contradict totally with the ideas of Leninism concerning the leadership of the Bolshevist party of Lenin `s type as it was defended and practiced by Stalin and Enver Hoxha. Mao tsetung was not a defender of a proletarian class party and did not cling to the relationship between Bolshevist party and the class of the proletariat. There was no Bolshevist line but politics of balancing the fractionism which was unacceptable for Lenin within the ranks of the Bolshevist party. The existence of „two lines“ is a product of the Mao Tsetung Ideas and totally incompatible with a Marxist-Leninist party which is based on the only proletarian line. The „Mao tsetung Ideas“ teaches the unity with the enemy, giving him the one hand and struggling against him with the other. These ideas are diametral contradictionary with the Leninist Communist party as the organized troup and avantguard which has only one monolithian line and only one iron unity of thought and act. The Bolshevist party is formed as one mould and not the arena of different blocs of different class-elements. Mao Tsetung was neither willing nor able to take to heart the principles and standards of a Bolshevist party. This concerns again the handling of his successors. It was Mao Tsetung himself who decided first Liu Schao – tschi, then Deng Hsiao – ping, Lin Piao and then Hua Kuo – feng as chairmen of the party after his death – and this after all their revisionist crimes and betrayals! The „Mao Tsetung Ideas“ are the modernized version of the old reactionary ideology of the Chinese Empire. In the course of the centuries the Chinese science of military was enriched by countless experiences. Mao Tsetung gave special prominence to the military politics and army. However the guns themselves are not a circumstantial evidence for a revolutionary „people`s war“ - as proclaimed by numerous armed Maoist organizations all over the world. That looks and sounds very „revolutionary“ , but is that really true ? Lenin always proclaimed the hegemony of the proletariat as the only revolutionary class who leads the armed struggle – and this concerns partucularly the strategy and tactics if the revolutionary people`s war. The theory of the people`s war is a theory from Lenin. The „Mao Tsetung Ideas“ („encircle and conquer the towns from the side of the villages“ - proletarian revolution in words and peasant-revolution in deeds!) are contrary to the Leninist dialectical theory of the proletarian revolution (peasantry as the the most important ally under the proletarian leadership). Mao Tsetung was not able to differ and combine the bourgeois-democratical revolution with the proletarian revolution because he did not understand the coherency which Lenin demonstrated masterly in theory and practice. This was the reason why Mao Tsetung was not able to lead over to the proletarian revolution. This historical task is still not yet fullfilled in China. The difference between the people`s war of Albania and China is for example based in the different classes, parties and their ideology who led them. In Albania there was a Bolshevist party with comrade Enver Hoxha at the top which applied to the teachings of Lenin – The people`s war which was led by thw Bolshevist party in Albania was crowned by the establishment of the dictatorship of the proletariat.

In Russia the proletarians were victorious by smashing the dictatorship of the bourgeoisie with their guns. Capitalism fell down by the violence of the October-Revolution. Lenin established and strengthened the Red Army as a weapon of the dictatorship of the proletariat to abolish the bourgeoisie as a class and to control the remainders, so that they would be unable to restore capitalism. Opposite to Mao tsetung Lenin never tolerated bourgeois elements neither in the Communist party nor anywhere alse. The Red Army resisted the world capitalist encirclement who collaborated with the counter-revolutionary White Guards within the country. The guns belonged to the proletariat and were commanded by the Bolshevist party and not the other way round. In China the „weapons commanded the party“. All political assumptions were accomplished by military-revolts; the army stood above the party. Whether in times of the liberation struggle, during the „Culture-Revolution“ or after the death of Mao – it was always the military which made the political decisions and played the decisive role in the China society– not a Bolshevist party. This is typical for all revisionist countries, in which the guns of the social-bourgeoisie keep the proletariat in check and not - as usually - in socialist countries, where the guns of the proletariat keep in check the class-enemies of the working class. And all this was taught by the „Mao Tsetung Ideas“ masked with Marxist-Leninist phrases. In China there was never a Bolshevist party, was never Marxism-Leninism in power, was never the dictatorship of the proletariat, there was never socialism. The revisionist China of Mao Tsetung had nothing to do with Lenin. Mao was a metaphysician and taught cyclical, evolutionist „theories“ masked by Leninist phrases. Mao Tsetung` s opinion of revolution was the course of periodical times of „great harmony“ and times of „great disorders“ - every 5 – 10 – 20 years a „Culture-Revolution“ etc. This is not reconciliable with the dialectical and historical materialism of Lenin who explained the progressive development of the society by forms of spirals, and as a key of selfmovement of all being, the key to qualitative bounds, ceisures of gradualities, the change of unity and contrary, the fade of the old one and the coming of the new one. However Mao Tsetung proclaims such sophistical formels like „dogmatism reversed becomes Marxism or revisionism“, „Metaphysics change to dialectics and dialectics to metaphysics“ etc.

Is this the „higher“ stage of Leninism?

Or are our critics on such anti-Leninist methods neo-revisionist?

The „M-L-M“ists condamn us Marxist-Leninists as „neo-revisionists“ because we critisize the anti-Leninism of Mao Tsetung as „renegades“. To some degree we can understand young „M-L-M-ists“, because most of the comrades, who struggled in the Sixtieth and Seventieth started their political activity on the level of M-L-M and needed some time – the ones a little bit earlier and the others a little bit later – to looking through the „Mao Tsetung Ideas“. However, they stepped forward to Marxism-Leninism by own experiences and self-critcizms and by the support from the Albanian comrades. We are not Neo-revisionists because we critisize the reconciliation between Marxism-Leninism and the „Mao Tsetung Ideas“. In the contrary, we are as Marxist-Leninists, enemies of the Chinese revisionism and support the socialist revolution against the socialfascist and social-imperialist regime of China. We support the socialist revolution of the Chinese proletariat which can only be victorious, if the proletariat rejects the negative influence of the „Mao Tsetung Ideas“ and if the proletariat acts according to the teachings of Marx, Engels, Lenin, Stalin and Enver Hoxha against Chinese revisionism. Neo-Revisionists are mixing up Marxism-Leninism with revisionism, and Maoism is completely revisionism.

We admire the ongoing struggle of the revolutionaries in Nepal in these days and give them internationalist support as good as we can to smash the oppressors and exploiters from inside and outside and to build up a progressive, anti-imperialist society, however we give the exploited and oppressed classes the advice to follow the teachings of Marx, Engels, Lenin, Stalin and Enver Hoxha and reject the „Mao Tsetung Ideas“. On the Maoist path you shall reach an impasse. Only the genuine Marxist-Leninist path leads to the victory of the Nepalese people as well to the victory of all peoples all over the world. Leads to socialism and communism.

In our opinion there is no essential demarcation line between the Chinese revisionism before and after the death of Mao Tsetung. The development of the Chinese socialimperialism and socialfascism of today is the logical consequence of the revisionist „Mao Tsetung Ideas“. It is characteristically that Neo-Maoists hide behind the „anti-revisionism“ of Maoism. The Neo-Maoists hide themselves behind the „anti-revisionist“ struggle against the socialfascism and social-imperialism of China after the death of Mao Tsetung. This is dangerous. However it is impossible to struggle successfully against Chinese revisionism by Chinese revisionism even masked with Marxist-Leninist phraseologie. You can only be victorious, if you smash down Chinese revisionism by genuine Marxism-Leninism. You cannot devide „revolutionary“ Maoism and revisionist Maoism. You cannot overcome Maoism by Maoism.

Neo-Revisionism as the casted skin of modern revisionism and ... is anything else then just juggling words and terms. The differences among the Neo-revisionists are not of principled nature but tactical disagreements on the question: how open - on the one side - and how masked - on the other side - revisionism ought to be presented in the given moment, under the given circumstances and in the given particular place and situation. It is the intention of the world bourgoisie to gain the optimum of effects to deceive the proletariat, the masses, the revolutionaries and the Marxist-Leninists just to hinder the revolution in every single place of the world. This phenomenon is a mirror of the adjustment`s difficulties of revisionism in the course of the permanent changing of the international class-struggle. And it was Lenin who masterly analysed and unmasked the developing and changing process of opportunism in his times and who masterly worked out the Bolshevist tactics to thwart the tactics of the opportunists. There is no essential difference between the times of Lenin and today concerning the nature of the developing process of revisionism: it is the historical tactic of the worldbourgeoisie against the world proletariat in the struggle against Marxism-Leninism.

You cannot overcome revisionism by revisionism. Neither the ideas of the „Gang of Four“, neither the Neo-Maoism (critisizing his ideas and works in words but follow his path in deeds) nor Kim IlSungism, Castroism, Che Guevara etc. is compatible in the struggle against revisionism, because they are alltogether revisionist thoughts although they pretend to „struggle against“ this or that branch of revisionism. Look at the Chinese revisionism. It could only develop under the anti-revisionist mask of the „struggle against the Soviet revisionism“. But the struggle against Soviet revisionism makes Chinese revisionism not sympathical, because it was useful as a weapon to build up the Chinese social-imperialism, to become a capitalist superpower. Certainly we could learn from the rivals struggle between China and Russia but it was a struggle on the back of the peoples. So if Lenin learnt from Clausewitz why should we not learn from Mao? We Marxist-Leninists never denied to learn from our class-enemies. Whether Mao tsetung , whether Krushchev, whether Castro, or even Ramiz Alia, all the revisionist leaders held festive speeches on Lenin and praising Leninism which they pretended to „defend“ against this or another revisionist country who betrayed Leninism. This is the way how l the revisionists all over the world do without any exception – otherwise they would not be revisionists. So you cannot hide behind the windscreen of one revisionism to struggle against the other. You can only crash revisionism and opportunism by Marxism-Leninism as the 5 classics proved this historically in words and deeds.

Have a look at the Neo-Krushchevites. There had been a lot of criticisms on the „Mao Tsetung Ideas“ to unmask the Chinese revisionism not to defend Leninism, but to hide their own revisionism. So, they are not stupid. They know, how to mask behind correct Marxist-Leninist arguements in the same way as the Chinese revisionists unmasked Krushchevism. And to be honest, we can learn from the struggle of the revisionists how they umask their rivals. But this struggle is not revolutionary, because they only missuse „anti-revisionist“ arguements to hide behind their own revisionism. You shall come to the same conclusions concerning all the other branches of revisionism. With „anti-revisionist“ arguments all the other neo-revisionists casted their skins from Catsroism to Neo- Castroism, from Kim il Sungism to Neo-Kim il Sungism, from Guevara-ism to Neo-Guevara-ism, from Titoism to Neo- Titoism, from Trotzkyism to Neo-Trotzyism, from Breshnewism to Neo-Breshnewism etc..etc..

In times when comrade Enver Hoxha attacked the Soviet revisionism without openly attacking the Chinese revisionism he was of value as an „ally of China“. When comrade Enver Hoxha openly criticized the „Mao Tsetung Ideas“ as to be revisionist, then Enver Hoxha was blamed as a „Neo-revisionist“. This was one of the reasons of the splitting of the Marxist-Leninist movement. This splitting however was neccessary to strengthen the demarcation-line between Marxism-Leninism and Maoism. So all the attempts of reconciliation between comrade Enver Hoxha and Mao Tsetung are anti-Leninist streamings. Lenin purified the Marxist world movement from opportunism in the struggle against centrist-bourgeois ideology of the disguised opportunists. If you reconciliate Enver Hoxha with Mao Tsetung then the world proletariat gives up Enver Hoxha as a great Marxist-Leninist, as a classic of Marxism-Leninism, and leaves him to the world bourgeoisie. This is unacceptable for us Marxist-Leninists and we shall never tolerate this betrayal.

A united font which counts on Mao Tsetung as an „Marxist-Leninist“ is only a united front against the world proletariat, against Marxism-Leninism, against the united front of the Marxist-Leninist world movement of comrade Enver Hoxha. Leninism of today does not mean to advance the united front in cooperation with the anti-Leninists, but to sharpen the demarcation-line to anti-Leninism.

Revisionism drives the wedge at the boundaries between the classics. In times of Lenin the revisionist slogans were: „Back to Marx and Engels!“ In times of Stalin: „Back to Lenin!“ In times of Enver Hoxha: „Back to Stalin!“ But behind these slogans the revisionists hide their intentions to refer to the historical personalities of opportunism. The truth is, that the revisionists of today only study the classics of Marxism-Leninism to learn how they struggled against the opportunists in their times. And with this knowledge they try to find anewed munition for the present struggle against Marxism-Leninism. The truth is, that the revisionists learn from the historical mistakes of their predesessors to create new branches of opportunism – and there are thousands in the meantime, so they were very busy! History proved that the world bourgeoisie – for an interim – succeeded to prolong the time if the fall of capitalism by the missuse of Marxism-Leninism. But history shall prove that this was only possible for an interim. The truth is, that the world proletariat is the progressive class which shall master the upbuilding of the future socialist society by the abolishment of the reactionary world bourgeoisie and the revolutionary destruction of world capitalism. Revisionism shall fall together with the classes which apply to revisionism – the classes of exploitation and oppression. So revisionism cannot hinder the fall of capitalism in the long term. If the revisionists try to tear away the classics of Marxism -Leninism to serve the capitalists, then the revisionists shall scald their hands.

The revisionist tactics to „swear“ upon the „rebirth“ of the preceding classic just to get better rid of the following classic, failed one after another. To dismantle the revolutionary leaders to get rid of the revolutionary movement is an old trick of the counter-revolution, but this could not stop the laws of the society`s development in the historical course of the class struggle. So there is no use in the efforts of the revisionists to dismantle the classics – beginning with Enver Hoxha in direction towards and the final dismantleling of Karl Marx to burry the whole Marxism in the end. Marxism-Leninism is irrefutable and invincible. In the first line of the international class-struggle the Marxist-Leninists defended all the classics of Marxism-Leninism against the missuse of the bourgeoisie, against opportunism and revisionism. In this struggle the bourgeoisie always ended in a disaster. The answer of the missuse of Marxism was the victorious October-Revolution. The missuse of Lenin led to the extention of a great Soviet Union. The missuse of Stalin and Enver Hoxha shall be answered by the victory of the world revolution and the extension of world socialism. The path towards communism is unstopable, whatever the revisionists do even if they play the role of the „defenders“ of the classics of Marxism-Leninism hypocritically just to slander the true Marxist-Leninists as „dogmatists“, „sectarians“, „neo-revisionists“ or whatever. In the end it is impossible to isolate the revolutionary leaders from the revolutionary masses.

Well, the bourgeoisie leaves nothing undone to isolate the classics from the revolutionary movement. If the bourgeoisie recognizes that it is very difficult to find convincing arguments against the classics of Marxism-Leninism then they try first to dismantle the nearest environment of the classics, for example that this or that leader was „not correctly following“ the teachings of the classics, that this or that decision „was not compatible“ with the teachings of the classics that this or that organisation „injured“ this or that decision of the classics, that this or that movement contradicted the classics , that the proletariat in this or that country made „mistakes“ in the class-struggle, that the proletariat in general „is not ripe“ for socialism, that it „was not ripe“ to understand the classics etc.... By this method the adversaries of the proletariat try to „prove“ that the revolutionary class, that the masses, are „unable“ to be victorious, that they are „unable“ to transform the teachings of the classics of Marxism-Leninism into practice. The bourgeoisie tries to make believe that it is the only class who is able to „understand“ Marxism-Leninism and that the proletariat can „trust“ in the leadership of the bourgeoisie, that bourgeois socialism is more „practicable“ and „easier“ to establish than proletarian socialism, because the proletariat needs not to think only to work. „So, please, you stupid proletarians keep your hands off the classics, we shall manage it for you!“ This is a total derision of the proletariat, a mockery against all exploited and oppressed classes ! These abominable arrogant bourgeois methods are directed against the revolutionary communist and worker`s movement, against Marxism-Leninism.

Defending the classics in words to isolate them from the revolutionary proletarian movement in deeds that is one of the most destructive methods of the counter-revolution. Personal-cult of the classics to liquidate the classics – that was and still is the aim of our class-enemies. The class-struggle in defence of Lenin – 80 years after his death – is not finished. In the contrary, this struggle of defence is the beginning! This struggle will take a long time, is a struggle that is decisive for the whole period between capitalism and communism. Moreover this struggle for Leninism shall aggravate.

The struggle for Leninism which Stalin and Enver Hoxha began successfully, is not finished today. It will be continued in such dimensions which we cannot imagine today.

Look at the old „modern“ revisionists. Do you remember when they clapped their hands listening Krushchev speech condamning Stalin after his death? What are the Krushchevites doing today? They changed their tactics by 180 degrees and started to applaud Stalin by condamnation of Krushchev. Why? In their times the revisionists needed Krushchev against Stalin.. and they got the power. Today they have lost their power. So what do they do to get it back? To re-conquer the power, they need Stalin against Krushchev whose pretended mistakes caused the fall of the revisionist`s power. If the revisionists would finally succeed to get back their power „with the help of Stalin“ - as the revisionists believe – then they shall drop Stalin like a hot potato and – after a while – they shall rehabilitate Krushchev just after their dreams would come true. This is not a joke, this is earnestly the tactic of the revisionists to reconquer their lost socialfascism and social-imperialism by reactivating their „sympathy“ for the classics of Marxism-Leninism - and above, we already condamned these tactics as social- revengeism. Again the proletariat and the exploited and oppressed classes are urged by the revisionists to „reconquer socialism“ (re-establishment of revisionist power !!) „from world imperialism“ ( to establish social-imperialism !!) And in the case, if it`s needed, the world bourgeoisie backs the second time a revisionist horse to save world capitalism from the new coming wave of Revolution.

Lenin created the Communist International to organize the victory over revisionism and opportunism. If we want to be true Leninists we have to continue the struggle of the Comintern, we have to organize our struggle against Neo-revisionism internationally.

Let us never forget when comrade Stalin took an oath at the grave of comrade Lenin on the 26th of January, 1924:

„When comrade Lenin deceased, he left behind the bequest, to preserve the principles of the Communist International faithfully.

We swear to you, comrade Lenin, that we shall - regardless of our live - strengthen and extend the alliance of the working people all over the world – the Communist International!“

We shall forever faithfully act to this oath which comrade Stalin took at the grave of comrade Lenin.



Long live comrade Lenin!

Long live the Leninism!

Long live the

founder and leader

of the

Communist International!



Wolfgang Eggers

15. 1. 2004



Here we put two links to the appendix:


Stalin: Lenin – Speech of January 28, 1924


Stalin: On the Death of Lenin - Speech of January 26, 1924